A man leans out of a Hummer shouting words in support of Donald Trump while driving through Times Square in New York early on Nov. 9. (Photo: Mark Kauzlarich/Reuters)
A man leans out of a Hummer shouting words in support of Donald Trump while driving through Times Square in New York early on Nov. 9. (Photo: Mark Kauzlarich/Reuters)

The results are in and Donald Trump has been elected as the 45th President of the United States in a surprise victory.

Despite the polls showing Hillary Clinton to have a slight but consistent and sustained lead, Donald Trump pulled off key wins in swing states such as Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania to end up with the majority of the electoral votes.

While it is much too early to determine what a Trump Administration will ultimately look like, we do have some guidance from recent history about the near-term effects – BREXIT ON STEROIDS!! Whenever there is uncertainty on a global scale, markets typically respond accordingly, especially when adjusting to surprising events. Overnight, futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell as much as 800 points and the S&P 500 dropped five percent as investors responded to updates about the election. Massive selloffs occurred throughout the world as returns started to come in. Asian markets fell sharply as indexes in Hong Kong, South Korea, and Japan fell between three and five percent. European stocks also dropped sharply, and the Mexican peso was off 11 percent before the election was called. Most of the losses were subsequently recovered, which is also not surprising.

Although market volatility is typically about twice the normal pattern on the day after an election (a fact which has absolutely no predictive power about the following twelve months), the Brexit experience is useful because of its recent vintage and its similar nature. Both Brexit and Mr. Trump’s election reflects surprising (more aptly, shocking) populist revolt in a major advanced economy. After Brexit, markets initially plummeted, recovered quickly, and have since been hypersensitive to any new information about an event with an uncertain future. We will likely see the same pattern in the coming months.

Irrespective of whether you liked Secretary Clinton’s proposals, they were predictable, incremental, and colored inside the lines of typical public policy. Mr. Trump’s do not, and markets are not fond of uncertainty. Thus, investors will tend to try to read meaning into everything, parse every word and deed, and react accordingly. The difference is that, while Great Britain is three percent of the global economy, the U.S. is 25 percent of world business activity and the linchpin of the international financial system. Hence, the reactions will be exaggerated accordingly.

The bigger question, of course, is the longer term economic consequences of President Trump’s tenure. That is also a source of mystery. Former New York Governor Mario Cuomo famously said that leaders “campaign in poetry” but “govern in prose.” In Mr. Trump’s case, he tended to campaign more in angry sound bites, and it remains to be seen how he governs. His prescriptions were often inconsistent, but the major ones, if truly implemented would be disastrous. If the U.S. were to suddenly begin deporting people by the millions, denying rights to millions of citizens, cancelling trade agreements, failing to honor treaties, dismantling the health care system, and a dozen other proposals shouted out loud, we would see an economic calamity that would make the 1930s look like a walk in the park, not to mention a social and human crisis of even greater proportions.

In the prose of governing, however, that is not how things work. Whether spoken in poetry or angry sound bites, the most provocative aspects of a campaign are invariably tempered by the system of checks and balances that our Founders provided. Presidents do not have unlimited powers, and there is ample statesmanship and common sense among the leaders of both parties. The Union has survived challenges that were much more daunting than a potentially unpredictable Presidency, and it will do so again. Despite our political discord and divisions, our economic and political institutions are the envy of the world and a source of great stability. We had an election on Tuesday, and we went to work on Wednesday. That is a treatment for our strength, which will endure. Speaking of endurance, we can take comfort in the fact that we can now enjoy a respite from political ads and punditry. That, in and of itself, should be a source of great joy and optimism!!