About Us Email Updates
 
[    ]

THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY'S HOME PAGE

 
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
HOME
Inside
Columns
1 1
1
Featured

 
 





Last Updated: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 07:45
Letters
Re Cuellar: Guatemala, Honduras, want their kids back
Dear Editor,

July 17, 2014

I am deeply disturbed by this report in the Rio Grande Guardian.

Having cared for these children and their mothers from Central America over the last few weeks, I am confused that Rep. Cuellar feels that speed is the answer to the Central American problem. If he is serious about solving the violence problem in these countries, shouldn't we begin with this and then move towards assisting the families to return to a safer place? Given the horrifying risks in the journey, does he really believe any mother would expose their children to this, if they were not fleeing something worse. I have heard stories of rape, sisters being murdered, children taken. Deporting them with speed, before we can assure that we are not sending to them to their death, is unconscionable and immoral. Speedy trials simply ensures that justice will not be done. As a citizen of the United States and a pediatrician with a vow to protect and heal children, I believe we can do better.

Truly outraged,

Dr. Marsha Griffin

Brownsville, Texas


Re: Hinojosa: Mother would rather have child die on journey to U.S. than at her front door
Dear Editor,

June 30, 2014

I would like to thank the Rio Grande Guardian for its account of Congressman Hinojosa's recent visit to a McAllen detention center at a Border Patrol Unit. I am very impressed at his rapid mobilizaiton of the Hispanic Congressional Caucus to attend to this tragic issue. I am in favor of humanitarian care to the families that are now in our country.

I would have equally impressed with Congressman Hinojosa if he had mobilized the Hispanic Congressional Caucus over the incident I reported to this office regarding the Border Patrol agent who killed himself rather than face criminal charges following his assault of two minors and another woman, two that he left for dead and the third that he sequestered to his apartment for continued criminal activity. The Border Patrol Unit immediately rushed the women out of the Rio Grande Valley so that no reporters would get to them for details. Interesting! Of course, I can understand Congressman Hinojosa's choice of events; the immigration surge carries international and national media clips as opposed to the criminal activity of our federal agents on women and children.

I contacted Congressman Hinojosa's office as well as other elected officials (Cuellar, Vela, Cruz and Cornyn) and not one responded. I am still waiting! A group of us are still waiting! We believe that there should be a commission formed, not of internal government officials, but of experts in health care who can interview the women and children who come face to face with our federal agents as we believe that what happened in Hidalgo County is not an isolated incident but a prevalent one. We request that this be a commission that is only federally represented and it could very well end up like the IRS or VA scandal to name two of the recent avalanche of scandals.

This weekend was different of course. Congresswoman Pelosi was here so there was more opportunity to demonstrate that action is being taken. Is it? What is it? I trust that when Congresswoman Pelosi returns to D.C., we will see more action and less words on the matter given that "We are all Americans."

One more thing, where did the acronym "OTM's (other than Mexicans)" originate? It sounds to me that it leans towards profiling. I am so pleased that Congressman Bennie Thompson visited the Valley. Perhaps he can help us delete that terminology given that he reviews the Department of Homeland Security.

Eloisa G. Tamez, RN, PhD, FAAN

Brownsville, Texas


Re: Supreme Court rules in Hobby Lobby case
Dear Editor,

June 30, 2014

The United States companies that are permitted to deny contraceptive coverage to their employees should realize those workers are not their slaves. They won't, though. Cruel companies. Cruel Supreme Court. But then again, why should companies be in the business of providing healthcare of any sort?

Once again. this week's Supreme Court's nod to employers' "morality," illustrates the need for a single-payer healthcare system in the United States. Then, individuals will be able to obtain the reproductive care they wish - freeing this vital piece of life from the religious whims of their employers; these employers will be out of the business of healthcare.

Follow your "moral code," Mr., Ms, Miss and Mrs. Boss all you wish; just don't impose it on your workers via monetary power. How smug you must feel after the Court validated your keep-women-in-place ideology. Sixty to seventy years of feints towards a single-payer plan; the result: half-baked compromises, and in the case of companies and health insurance, bad for the companies, bad for the employees.

Several states are on the verge of enacting single-payer health plans. Good move. But as for most of the states, as well as the federal government, do not hold your breath. So basic, a woman's reproductive choices, from contraception to a safe and legal abortion.

While on this topic, abortions would decline dramatically, as they have in Europe, when contraception, sex education and open family planning discussion are givens. A bit odd: XXX movies, porn in all forms, sex in ads, all quite open, yet, the nuts and bolts of reproduction can't be discussed and taught openly in many parts (including much of Texas) of the United States.

Such a modern nation we are, with technology booming; however, in the area of healthcare as a pooled right and responsibility, we are in an ugly time warp.

Eugene 'Gene' Novogrodsky

1547 W Washington St.

Brownsville, TX 78520


Re: Overturning Citizens United
Dear Editor,

May 31, 2014

Most of the time, whatever the Supreme Court is doing up there in D.C. doesn’t really impact our lives here in the southernmost tip of Texas. But, when the Supreme Court destroyed limits on spending in our elections in the Citizens United and McCutcheon rulings, it made a huge impact on our lives.

Now that corporations can give unlimited amounts to influence elections, and wealthy donors can give millions directly to parties and candidates, everyday Americans are paying a price. We pay a price when our elected officials are more responsive to donors than constituents. We pay it when our representatives create huge tax loopholes for their corporate donors. And, we pay it when lax regulations endanger our health and security.

Finally, we can do something about it. People in towns and cities across the country are advancing resolutions through their city and town councils and state legislatures that declare support for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, challenge corporate power, and eliminate unlimited campaign spending. The Senate is taking a vote on a constitutional amendment and holding a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, June 3. Please join me in asking Senators Cornyn and Cruz – who both serve on the Judiciary Committee - to support that amendment by calling their offices or writing a letter. Many thanks!

Madeleine Sandefur

Laguna Vista, Texas


Re: Shinseki resigns
Dear Editor,

May 31, 2014

My opinion is that General Eric Shinseki, a very, very rare honest and honorable military American hero and public servant in Washington, D.C., was unfairly 'thrown under the bus' with so many opportunist politicians turning against him.

The turned against him to cover-up for their failure to conduct congressional investigations when so many U.S. Veterans had filed complaints regarding VA inefficiency and retribution, many years before General Shinseki became VA Secretary.

General Shinseki opened the door for us veterans to speak to him one-on-one, the truly 'open door' policy which so many politicians promise, but soon forget once they get to D.C. The Department of Veterans’ Affairs need to be investigated by a commission of military-retired NCOs and officers with the power to recommend indictments to the Justice Department, not by bureaucrats, to get to the bottom of the problem – and to resolve so many festering issues; thereby preventing needless Veterans’ deaths – and to stop the ludicrous squandering of “bonus” taxpayer money. Nobody knows the problem, better than those affected by it.

Is it going to take another VA-type scandal for President Obama and members of congress to take corrective action regarding the obvious racism and mismanagement so prevalent in the U.S. Postal Service? How many more deaths will it take, to get your attention?

Placido Salazar

Vietnam War veteran

San Antonio, Texas


Re: Moves afoot to un-designate Hidalgo County Courthouse as historic
Dear Editor,

April 18, 2014

The Edinburg Mayor wants a publicㅡprivate partnership. That may work well at first but if there are problems in the future then we may have a lawsuit which could end up costing us more in the end. Sometimes these companies go bankrupt also. What happens then? In my opinion the Hidalgo County residents should be able to vote on bonds towards the construction of a new courthouse. The majority of the voters should decide whether we want to pay more property taxes for the project.

Xavier Cervantes

San Juan, Texas


Re: Moves afoot to un-designate Hidalgo County Courthouse as historic
Dear Editor,

April 18, 2014

Wow, what lack of imagination in this design! A square box, like the old courthouse. Can't these men (judging from the photos) consider a style of architecture in tune with local history? Spanish colonial, perhaps? Hidalgo county derives from Father Miguel Hidalgo, who was the Mexican priest who led the revolt of the peasantry during the Mexican revolution. The "square" has a sculpture of him; are our "leaders" so out of touch with history and so devoid of curiosity? All that glass?? Hurricane season, not to mention high electric bills, will be not so amusing!

Yolanda Jurado

McAllen, Texas


Re: Valley legislators celebrate medical school success
Dear Editor,

April 18, 2014

Rio Grande Valley politicians, Med School master planners and community groups, please think about this. An RGV full-service 24/7 VA hospital would not only provide the medical care which our Valley Veterans need but would provide gigantic economic and employment opportunities for this depressed and high-unemployment region. Sure, programs such as zumba classes, nutrition classes, cooking classes are important, but I believe that the healthcare of our more than 120,000 Valley veterans should deserve just a bit more attention from these decision-making personnel. Imagine the thousands of high-income jobs and the spending power that goes with it of several hundred doctors and other medical professionals, plus the secondary support businesses which a veteran medical facility would attract.

Placido Salazar

USAF Retired Vietnam Veteran

Veterans’ Legislation Liaison

Dr. Hector P. Garcia American GI Forum Org of Texas

America’s Last Patrol

Veterans of Foreign Wars

Universal City, Texas


Re: Cortez to give major speech on Valley's economy
Dear Editor

April 9, 2014

Mr.Cortez is right to continue to put the data-based truth out there.

All-too-often the political leadership is given a dispensation to make data free pronouncements that are nothing but a fabrication of erroneously interpreted facts.

I recall hearing Congressman Hinojosa proclaim once at a conference that he was proud of the fact that over 80 percent of GearUP participants were enrolling in colleges and universities. That to me, based on my analysis of the data, was a bunch of hooey. I recall meeting with my former department chair at UTPA and surmising that barely 16 percent of GearUP participants ever made to a post-secondary educational institution. No one ever challenged the Congressman because he was, after all, the chair of the Higher Education Committee of the House.

The issues that Mr. Cortez presents require policy and programmatic responses from those agencies that are charged with bringing about change. The economic development corporations, colleges and universities, the county and municipal elected officials and the Lower Rio Grande Development Council need to develop an accountability and resource based strategy. The one in place, from Mr. Ken Jones, has no baselines or benchmarks that can be referenced before those agencies that were charged with making something happen. All I see is much posturing and aggrandizement by elected officials that are always been recognized for doing something that is commonplace and which does not hold water.

I am looking forward to reviewing the transcript of Mr. Cortez's comments and I hope that his admonishments do not fall on deaf ears.

Baltazar Acevedo y Arispe, Jr.

Waco, Texas.


Re: Wendy Davis meets with leading Valley women
Dear Editor

March 2, 2014

Thanks for the superb coverage of Wendy Davis' meetings with Rio Grande Valley women.

Wendy Davis, Leticia Van De Putte and many Rio Grande Valley women have educated me about the importance of women's and children's healthcare, along with issues of public education, veterans' care and a more creative economy.

I know these women, in most cases, are far ahead of Valley and Texas men in their concern for the overall betterment of a huge and growing Texas.

I hope millions of women, as well as men - and the latter need to put their false sense of male superiority aside - vote for Wendy Davis and Leticia Van De Putte come November.

If Wendy Davis and Leticia Van De Putte win the election, the changes in Texas will resound positively around the nation, and even the world.

Eugene "Gene' Novogrodsky

Brownsville, Texas


Re: Bishop Flores: Border wall is a 'psychological scar' for South Texas
Dear Editor,

November 29, 2013

Thanks for the great article. I was fortunate to witness some of the 1960s’ social justice improvements. Clearly visible then at the front of marches across South Texas to improve the quality of life of its residents were many Catholic priests. In truth, Mexican-descent Texans owe their socio-economic blessings to this type of activism.

Sadly, I also witnessed a deliberate roll back of that church-led activism beginning in the late 70’s. That unfortunate lull (caused primarily by the church’s joining the far-right in the issues of abortion and gay rights) lasted for too long. (Pope Francis has correctly noted that unfortunate path and has promised to change direction to devote precious time on human rights issues that matter such as this one.)

Regardless, I’m glad that the Bishop posse is engaged to achieve immigration reform and finally end the 1960s’ War on Poverty. By the way, San Antonio’s Bishop Siller is equally concerned and leading efforts to get the word out to the decision-makers to do the right thing for the right reasons.

Very Respectfully,

José Antonio “Joe” López


Re: Abbott: We have to address healthcare needs of South Texans
Dear Editor,

November 13, 2013

A joke, it must be, Republican candidate for Governor Greg Abbott's professed concern for South Texas' health needs. Abbott is part of the Republican Party/Tea Party ilk in Austin that refused to expand Medicaid and has done all that is possible to cripple the Affordable Care Act. South Texans are paying a huge price for this neglect.

Toss in the horrible restrictions on women's reproductive health and choice, with an unrelenting effort to kill Planned Parenthood, and one can feel Abbott's joke sadly grow.

Democratic candidate for Governor Wendy Davis doesn't offer such jokes. Her health concerns are believable!

Eugene 'Gene' Novogrodsky

Brownsville, Texas.


Re: Hinojosa: With hindsight, DPS would not have set up Valley checkpoints
Dear Editor,

October 19, 2013

What I take from the results of the ill-advised DPS valley checkpoints program is as follows:

(1) The absorption into the U.S. colossus in 1848 instantly turned South Texans (former citizens of Tamaulipas) into strangers in their own homeland. This “colonial” style of governing in Texas continues to this day. In my view, that’s why there is so much difference in social-economic-political factors north and south of Highway 59.

(2) There was a time when “Rinches” intimidation was common throughout South Texas. The horrid storm trooper methods were reluctantly accepted by Mexican-descent citizens as a method to cope. Make no mistake. The DPS “Oops” moment when they removed the checkpoints was due to the fact that Rio Grande Valley residents of all backgrounds are not going to take it anymore. That’s why it’s important for citizens to voice their displeasure when they see officials abusing their power.

Not that they were acceptable even then, but such treatment of loyal citizens belongs in the 1950s, not the 21st Century. Now, if State Senator Juan Hinojosa and other community leaders can help us stop and get rid of other Republican-owned Voter ID, redistricting, and racial profiling, South Texas Mexican-descent citizens can begin to enjoy everyday life without officially-sanctioned intimidation.

José Antonio “Joe” López

Universal City, Texas.


Re: Why did anybody in the Valley speak up against Ted Cruz
Dear Editor,

October 19, 2013

What leaders are you talking about in the Rio Grande Valley? There are none. All who were there when Cruz spoke were there to find out how they were going to fill their pockets.

Kiko Salazar

Via Email


Re: Why didn't anybody in the Valley speak up against Ted Cruz
Dear Editor,

October 14, 2013

What made anybody in The Rio Grande Valley, besides Aaron Peña, think that U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, who knows NOTHING about the economic or health situation of our people, would do anything to alleviate the dire situation? I guess everybody in The Valley was fooled by the Hispanic name. This guy is a “showman” for the rich, who cannot be trusted, and nothing more.

Placido Salazar

San Antonio, Texas


Re: López: Tejano history barely dodged the SB 1128 bullet
Dear Editor,

July 29, 2013

Mr. López kept referring to us as "Spanish Mexican." That's one of the problems right there. We are not Spanish, we are not European, foreigners, or immigrants.

When the word "Mestizo" was first coined it was referring to people who were 98 percent Indigenous and two percent Spanish. Mexican Americans should embrace the factual truth that we are also Native Americans and inherently belong to this land.

I am very displeased that the Tejano Monument on the Capitol grounds has a Spaniard looking over the land and people he will conquer for his King! I also don't like it when the word "Hispanic" is used to identify us!

Anita Quintanilla

Austin, Texas.


Re: Vela wins praise for opposing 'border surge' legislation
Dear Editor,

July 3, 2013

I just read your article concerning Congressman Vela's actions and feel like I've died and gone to Valhalla where real warriors with courage abound. I only wish Jay (Johnson-Castro) was here to read that. Thank you very much for a wonderful 4th of July. I will toast Congressman Vela, a real American.

John Neck

Brownsville, Texas


Re: Treviño: I will pray for Wendy Davis
Dear Editor,

July 2, 2013

'Stand up. Be Counted. No Matter What!'

That is what I did yesterday. Standing up for Women’s Rights in Texas. The amazing feat by Sen. Wendy Davis last week, as well as Monday’s rally in Austin, and the subsequent extreme outpouring of support, prompted us to visit our state Senator Eddie Lucio, Jr.’s district office. We wanted to show our solidarity with these women, and made our concerns clear: “Senator, with all due respect to your personal religious beliefs, we, as your constituents, are counting on you to represent us fairly. After all, it is the Voters who elected you, not the Church!”

To their credit, state Reps. Lucio III and Oliveira voted against the devastating bills now before the legislature (SB5 and HB16, newly named SB9 and HB2), which infringe on womens' constitutional rights. These bills, if enacted, will change the time at which a woman can legally obtain an abortion from 24 to 20 weeks; this provision is in violation of federal law. In addition, the bills restrict the dispensing of the abortion pill, impose the requirement of physicians performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a hospital within a 30 miles radius, and, most concerning, requires clinics to upgrade their facilities to ambulatory surgical centers, meaning only fiv of the 42 clinics statewide currently can meet this standard. These restrictions will be devastating to women’s health in Texas; therefore, we urgently need all of our representatives to stand up for the majority of their constituents!

'Stand up. Be Counted. No Matter What!' That’s what I’m doing today, by writing this letter.

Madeleine Sandefur

Laguna Vista, TX


Re: Treviño: I will pray for Wendy Davis
Dear Editor,

July 1, 2013

Pray on, Ms. Ramona Treviño, for Texas State Senator Wendy Davis.

She'll take the prayers, and then continue to work for safe and feasible abortion for all Texas women, while also supporting comprehensive health care for these women, thus reducing the need for abortion.

By the way, deep South Texas Representatives René Oliveira and Eddie Lucio, III, certainly not in favor of abortion (who is?) voted against the restrictive bill - thus backing Senator Davis.

Thanks Representatives Oliveira and Lucio for Texas women's right to choose; the bill if passed in this special session will make it virtually impossible for a poor and middle class Texas woman to obtain an abortion.

State Senator Eddie Lucio, in favor of the bill, has listened to opponents, and his very polite office staff in Brownsville and Austin have, too.

Thanks for the listening, Senator, but no thanks on the vote!

I hope the Senator withdraws his support of the bill, and dramatically joins in an effort to create an excellent health care system for all Texans.

What a great surprise that would be: very wealthy Texas becoming the United States leader in healthcare, and also accepting federal Medicaid funds, plus restoring funding to Planned Parenthood.

I, too, pray, Ms. Treviño, but for different results than yours!

Eugene "Gene" Novogrodsky

Brownsville, Texas


Re: Valley mayor says he will share a stage with Sen. Ted Cruz
Dear Editor,

June 19, 2013

Thank you Mr. Taylor and the Rio Grande Guardian for the 'Valley mayor says he’ll share a stage with Ted Cruz' article. Mayor Villarreal’s response to Senator Cruz’ staff’s request is typical of South Texas hospitality. Having met the Mayor personally during one of my early Texas history presentations at the RGC Library, I have no doubt of his cordiality, open mind, and his sincerity in “getting things done” for his constituents.

My unsolicited advice to my fellow Mexican-descent Mayor Villarreal is simply this. Sir, understand who you are dealing with. It is obvious that the Cruz staff is only interested in a photo-op and here’s why: (l) Senator Cruz said that he was going to Washington DC to dismantle it. (2) He does not believe in the 50-United States national framework, i.e., Medicare, Social Security, public education (a vital institution in the RGV), etc. (3) Based on his non-performance since he got there, he’s still on that path. (4) As a Tea Party politician, Senator Cruz is not interested in helping, but in obstructing. And (5) Since he is not a Texas native, he is clueless as to why Immigration Reform is crucial to the needs of South Texas families.

The truth is that many RGV residents still need a helping hand to escape their suffering cycle of despair. Immigration Reform is part of that equation. Clearly, Senator Cruz does not support that goal. Based on his very well-known arrogance, neither does he appear interested in being recruited to help reach it. Thank you.

Very Respectfully,

José Antonio López

San Antonio, Texas


Re: Sad Anniversary
Dear Editor,

June 18, 2013

Anniversaries can be wonderful times of celebrating – births, marriages, years of employment. They can also be times of sad remembering - deaths of family members, friends, a vibrant parish.

June 18 marks the 10th anniversary of one such sad event – the destruction of Holy Spirit parish in McAllen. On that day, under the former bishop’s order, staff were fired, locks changed, and armed guards took up positions. (Monitor stories of June 2003 reported on the events for two weeks.)

Through a court order, staff were reinstated. It became, however, a hostile work environment, bent on forcing a number of them to quit under a new pastor put in place for just that purpose. I, in fact, was “fired” from my volunteer position as coordinator of the peace and justice committee.

The parish had been so vibrant, so life-giving, so justice-oriented. For many, none of those qualities can be found there anymore.

The saddest thing of all, and which should lay heavily on the shoulders of the former bishop and the current pastor, is the number of people who have left the church. These people have left not only the parish, but the Catholic church as well. Children and adults who witnessed and were subjected to this hostile take over have suffered. Those who were children at the time cannot understand why a bishop, a priest, would do this. Their faith has been shaken to the core, and a bishop and a priest are responsible.

Fortunately, however, many feel the demise of their parish has helped them see themselves as church, as Vatican II taught. Although the event of ten years ago marked the death of a vibrant parish, new life has sprung up from the ashes of people’s pain and helped them find new life beyond the confines of a church building and an authoritarian hierarchy.

Sister Moira Kenny

McAllen, Texas


Re: Years and Confusion

Dear Editor,

March 3, 2013

I flip the calendar; the year is 2013, the month March.

February was Black History Month, but the efforts to overturn the Voting Rights Act took me back to the 1950s, even the years before and after the Civil War. Will the Supreme Court agree that there is no need for the act, thus giving many states, including Texas, the chance to dilute black and Hispanic votes via reactionary redistricting and various voting obstacles?

What a sad end to 2013's Black History Month.

March. Women's History Month, with Governor Rick Perry and the Texas Legislature refusing to accept federal health funds - funds that our taxes created - along with their endless attacks on Planned Parenthood, which, by the way, is the best program to continue if one wishes to minimize the need for abortion. So here is 2013, and for Texas women it might as well be the 1950s, and even a century before.

Looking ahead, September will be Hispanic Culture Month, and what kind of racist state and federal laws will start and end that month?

Others might casually move from month to month, with scant concern for their designation. I can't. I know too much history.

It is distressing to see the Supreme Court, many states and the federal government eroding in various ways human rights, rights that belong to all citizens, as well as immigrants, regardless of their legal status.

Eugene 'Gene' Novogrodsky
Brownsville, Texas


Re: Lucio: My bills will help students struggling in poor-performing schools

Dear Editor,

March 2, 2013

The name "vouchers" has been made the derogatory "curse-word" of those that live off of school tax dollars.

The most descriptive name is "parental-choice scholarships". They are scholarships that are designed to give parents a choice of which school they want their child to attend.

Stated this way, what parent would not want choices of which school they send their child to?

Bob Schoolfield
President
Texans for Parental Choice in Education


Re: Canseco refuses to accept CD 23 defeat

Dear Editor,

November 8, 2012

What’s with Quick Canseco not wanting to accept defeat gracefully? It’s not like it was a close race, nor is it like he should feel that he will be missed by the majority of working class residents of District 23, who voted to kick him out. Please, Quico – do not let the door hit you on the way out.

Placido Salazar, USAF Retired Vietnam Veteran

San Antonio, Texas


 

 
 
 
 
 
Top